The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
February 2021
Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
Howell Area Fire Authority -and- Michigan Association of Fire Fighters | Petition for 312 Arbitation Dismissed: | 2/19/2021 | 19-C-0498-CB | Petition for 312 Arbitration |
City of Kalamazoo (Dept. of Public Safety) -and- Caleb Dumond |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charging Party Failed to State Valid PERA Claim; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order May Warrant Dismissal of Charge. |
2/12/2021 |
(no exceptions) |
Failure to State Claim; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order |
County of Washtenaw -and- Tracey Smith |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charging Party Failed to State a Valid PERA Claim; Employer Did Not Violate PERA by Failing to Provide a Policy Related to Charging Party's Discipline; Alleged Violation Under Section 10(1)(e) Cannot be Maintained by an Individual Charging Party; Charge Related to July 2019 Discipline Untimely Under the Commission's Strict Six-Month Statute of Limitations Period. |
2/12/2021 |
(no exceptions) |
Failure to State Claim; Statute of Limitations |
Wayne County (Department of Public Services) -and- AFSCME Council 25, Local 101 -and- Alfred Washington |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charging Party's Filings Fail to Provide Any Allegation that, if Proven True, Could Establish that the Union Acted in a Manner that was Arbitrary or in Bad Faith in Violation of PERA; An Actionable Claim Regarding Charging Party's Termination Untimely Under the Commission's Strict Six-Month Statute of Limitations Period. |
2/12/2021 |
(no exceptions) |
Failure to State Claim; Statute of Limitations |
Detroit Retirement System -and- Lennie Jackson |
Motion for Reconsideration Denied: Charging Party Presented Same Issues Previously Addressed by Commission in Prior Order; None of Charging Party's Arguments Alter the Fact that He Failed to State Any Valid PERA Claim. |
2/9/2021 | 20-D-0750-CE | Motion for Reconsideration |
University of Michigan Health System and University of Michigan House Officers Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Found: Employer Violated PERA by Unilaterally Making Parking Changes by Relocating Blue Parking Spots; The Changes Were Substantial Changes in Working Conditions and had a Material Impact on Unit Employees and Required the Employer to Bargain; By Refusing to Accede to the Union's Demand for Bargaining, the Employer Violated PERA; CBA Contains No Employee Parking Provisions Related to the Two Parking Lots to Which the Vast Majority of Changes Were Effectuated, and No Contract Language Addresses the Parking Issues in Dispute. |
2/9/2021 | 19-H-1721-CE | Mandatory Subject of Bargaining; Duty to Bargain; Dispute Not Covered by Contract |
Wayne County -and- AFSCME, Council 25, Local 2926.01 |
Unfair Labor Practice Found: Charging Party's Initial Request for Job Descriptions Made Outside of PERA's Six-Month Statute of Limitations Period; Respondent's Delay of Six Months in Providing the Subsequently Requested Job Descriptions Violated Section 10(1)(e); The Circumstances Argued by Respondent Do Not Excuse its Significant and Excessive Delay in Providing Information Relevant Under PERA. |
2/8/2021 |
(no exceptions) |
Statue of Limitations; Information Request; 10(1)(e) |
Wayne County Airport Authority -and- AFSCME Council 25, Local 1690 -and- POAM |
Unfair Labor Practice Found in Case No. 20-C-0596-CE-1: Respondent Violated Sections 10(1)(a) and (e) by Circumventing Charging Party as Exclusive Bargaining Representative and Dealing Directly With its Members. Unfair Labor Practice Not Found in Case No. 20-C-0596-CE-2: Record Does Not Support a Finding That Respondent Unlawfully Transferred the Duties and Responsibilities of the ARC Supervisor Position to Lead Communication Specialist; An Employer's Decision to Unilaterally Transfer Duties From One Unit to Another Constitutes a Violation of the Duty to Bargain Only if it Can Be Established That the Work was Exclusive to the Members of the Bargaining Unit Bringing the Unfair Labor Practice Charge. |
2/2/2021 | 20-C-0596-CE-1 & 20-C-0596-CE-2 (no exceptions) | Duty to Bargain; Transfer of Duties; Direct Dealing |