Approved:
April 8, 1993
DISCLOSURE OF TAX RETURN INFORMATION -
SUBPOENAS, COURT ORDERS AND SEARCH WARRANTS
(Replaces Revenue Administrative Bulletin 1989-40)
RAB-93-1. This bulletin incorporates the amendments to the Revenue
Act, MCL 205.28(l)(f); MSA 7.657(28)(1)(f) made by Public Act 13 of 1993. This
amendment established the standards for the Department of Treasury's compliance
with a judicial order compelling production of tax returns and tax return
information, and statutorily limits the persons or parties who may obtain a
judicial order compelling the Department to provide tax returns and tax return
information.
Disclosure of tax returns and tax return information to someone other than
the taxpayer is statutorily restricted to protect taxpayer confidentiality.
Generally, Treasury's Disclosure Officer makes the initial determination
regarding disclosure.
Tax returns or tax return information may be open to inspection by or
disclosed to employees and representatives of Treasury's Bureau of Revenue if
disclosure is required for proper administration of a tax law administered under
the Revenue Act. Tax administration includes assessment, collection,
enforcement, litigation, and statistical gathering functions under existing laws
and statutes.
Further, tax returns or tax return information may be open to inspection by
or disclosure to a third party pursuant to a judicial order issued by a court,
consistent with the requirements of 1941 P.A. 122, section MCL 205.28(l)(f); MSA
7.657(28)(1)(f), as follows:
- An agency charged with the duty of enforcing or investigating support
obligations pursuant to an order of the court in a domestic relations matter
as described in MCL 552.531; MSA 25.176(31); or
- An agency of the federal, state, or local government charged with the
responsibility of administering or enforcing criminal law for purposes of
investigating or prosecuting criminal matters or federal or state grand jury
proceedings; or
- Pursuant to a judicial order, if the taxpayer's liability for a tax
administered under the Revenue Act is to be adjudicated by the court that
issues that order.
In determining whether to release tax returns or tax return information in
response to a court's request, the Department differentiates between compelling
production of tax return information versus compelling appearance and production
of tax return information.
Production of Information Only
A judicial order signed by a judge or magistrate of a court of competent
jurisdiction compelling the production of tax returns and tax return information
for discovery or photocopying will be honored for judicial and
administrative proceedings described above.
Subpoenas signed by an officer of a court (other than the judge or
magistrate) compelling the production of tax returns and tax return information
for discovery or photocopying will not be honored. These documents
are not "judicial orders," as indicated in Revenue Administrative Bulletin
1989-39.
Appearance and Production of Information
A judicial order signed by a judge or magistrate or a court of competent
jurisdiction compelling an appearance and the production of tax returns and tax
return information will be honored for judicial and administrative
proceedings described above.
Subpoenas signed by an officer of a court (other than the judge or
magistrate) of competent jurisdiction compelling an appearance and the
production of tax returns and tax return information will be
honored for judicial and administrative proceedings described above.
Limitation of Judicial Orders
It is the understanding of the Department of Treasury that the legislation
most recently adopted limits the persons or parties who may obtain a judicial
order compelling the production or disclosure of taxpayer information only to
agencies investigating support obligations in domestic relations matters,
agencies investigating criminal matters, and pursuant to a judicial order where
the taxpayer's tax liability is to be adjudicated. No judicial orders should be
issued at the request of any other party or in any other circumstance.
Example: Attorney Jones subpoenas Treasury's Disclosure Officer on
behalf of his client, Credit Corporation. The subpoena requests copies of
Michigan income tax returns for 1991 and 1992. The subpoena is signed by a
judge. The Disclosure Officer refuses to comply with the subpoena and sends a
written reply to Attorney Jones. The subpoena does not fit the criteria of
domestic relations support investigation, tax judicatory procedures, or
criminal investigation. For those reasons, the Disclosure Officer rightfully
refuses to comply with the subpoena.