The out-of-state trucking
company would have nexus with Michigan for purposes of the MBT if the company
either picked up or delivered product in Michigan during 2 or more days within
the tax year. Furthermore, the company would have nexus with Michigan if the
company merely drives through Michigan, i.e, travels through Michigan on a trip
that originates and terminates outside of Michigan, with no pick up or delivery
in Michigan and with no other business activity in Michigan, during 2 or more
days within the tax year.
If nexus is established, the
taxpayer's business income and modified gross receipts tax bases must be
apportioned by multiplying each tax base by the sales factor. MCL 208.1301(1).
Generally, for an out-of-state transportation company, receipts from
transportation services provided by the transportation company are sourced
according to MCL 208.1305(11), (12) based on the ratio of revenue miles in
Michigan (numerator) to revenue miles everywhere (denominator). Revenue mile
means the transportation for consideration of one net ton in weight or one
passenger the distance of one mile. MCL 208.1113(7). Receipts from
transportation services are combined with other receipts or sales of the
taxpayer to compute the sales factor. Note that once nexus exists in a tax
year, then all revenue miles driven in Michigan, including revenue miles
associated with "drive through" trips made in Michigan, are included in the
apportionment formula numerator. For an out-of-state transportation company
that is a "foreign person" as defined in MCL 208.1207(8)(d) and is subject to
MBT taxes, the sales factor is a fraction, the numerator of which is the
taxpayer's total sales in Michigan where title passes inside the United States
during the tax year and the denominator of which is the taxpayer's total sales
in the United States where title passes inside the United States during the tax
year. MCL 208.1207(7).
Under MCL
208.1207(1)(i), however, a foreign trucking company domiciled in a subnational
jurisdiction would not be subject to MBT taxes, notwithstanding the fact that it
has nexus with Michigan for MBT, where that subnational jurisdiction does not
impose an income tax on a similarly situated person domiciled in Michigan whose
presence in the foreign country is the same as the foreign trucking company's
presence in the United States. Furthermore, if a subnational jurisdiction does
not impose an income tax on businesses, but instead imposes some other type of
subnational business tax, then the foreign trucking domiciled in that
subnational jurisdiction is not subject to MBT taxes if that subnational
jurisdiction's business tax is not imposed on a similarly situated person
domiciled in Michigan whose presence in the foreign country is the same as the
foreign person's presence in the United States. MCL 208.1207(1)(i).