Browsers that can not handle javascript will not be able to access some features of this site.
Skip Navigation
MI Civil Service CommissionMichigan.gov-Official Website for the State of Michigan
Michigan.gov Home MCSC Home | Contact MCSC | MCSC Online Services
Printer Friendly Version Printer Friendly   Text Only Version Text Version  Share this page.
Professional Managerial Ranking System

Michigan Civil Service Commission

Group Three

  Professional Managerial Position Evaluation System

This evaluation system is designed to determine the appropriate level for most professional managerial positions in the Group 3 of the Equitable Classification Plan. This system evaluates professional positions with less than division-level status that supervise at least one professional or equivalent subordinate position or two or more non-professional subordinate positions. Positions in certain professional managerial classifications may be allocated by Civil Service approved alternative standards described in the specifications for the classification (i.e., Physicians, Administrative Law Examiners, etc.)  


Factor I - Supervision Exercised  

This factor measures the type and level of supervision exercised. For this factor evaluation, professional positions are defined as those positions, which require an incumbent to possess a bachelor's degree or higher as stated in the Civil Service job specifications. Only non-professional positions/subordinates allocated at the ECP 11 level or higher are considered equivalent to professional position for the purposes of this factor rating.


  Factor II - Nature of Work  

This factor measures the nature of work being performed by rating the complexity of the work, the impact the work has on other programs, the nature of the guidelines available to carry out the work, and the type of direction received by the position.  


Structural Limitations on Managerial Concept Applications  

The highest level of management must be evaluated first and the lower levels evaluated in descending order. This is because a superior position must equal or exceed the rating of a subordinate position on both the complexity and direction received factors. To do otherwise, could result in a subordinate position being at the same level as its supervisor.  


Scoring and Evaluation

Add the points given on Factors I and II and determine the managerial positions level using the table below:

Total Points

ECP Level

50

12

60/70

13

80/90

14

100

15

>120

16

                 

FACTOR I
Supervision Exercised 

ELEMENT

LEVEL/TYPE OF SUPERVISION

POINTS

1 Direct supervision over two or more non-professional subordinate positions or one professional or equivalent* subordinate position. 10
2 Direct supervision over two or more professional or equivalent* subordinate positions. 20
3 Second-line supervision of professional or equivalent subordinate positions through first-line professional managers; or, one first-line manager and two or more professional or equivalent subordinate positions. 40
4 Third-line supervision of professional or equivalent subordinate positions through second-line professional managers; or, one second-line professional manager and two or more professional or equivalent subordinate positions. 60
5 Fourth-line supervision of professional or equivalent subordinate positions through third line-professional managers; or, one third-line professional manager and two or more professional or equivalent subordinate positions. 80

*Only non-professional positions/subordinates allocated at the ECP 11 or higher level are considered equivalent to professional positions for the purposes of this factor rating.

FACTOR II
Nature of Work

Direction Received and Guidelines Complexity and Impact of Operation
Work is standardized in nature and usually involves functions with some impact on other programs.
A
Work is complex in nature and usually involves functions with major impact on other programs.
B
5 Direction received or guidelines are generally defined or available. Work methods are determined in accordance with general methods, procedures, and policies. Considerable independent judgment is needed to adapt and apply these methods, procedures, and policies to specific situations, typically under the direction of a manager or administrator.
40
60
6 Direction received and guidelines are generally very limited. Work methods are determined in accordance with broad departmental policies. Extensive independent judgment is needed to adapt these policies and to develop and implement new approaches to business and administration activities, typically under the direction of an executive.
60
80

   

Professional Managerial Concept Chart

ECP LEVEL

CONCEPTS

12
Manager of one professional or two or more non-professionals in a standard work area.
13
A. Manager of two or more professionals in a standard work area.
  OR
  B. Manager of one professional or two or more non-professionals in a complex work area.
  OR
  C. Manager of one professional or two or more non-professionals in a standard work area receiving executive direction.
14
A. Manager of professionals in a complex work area.
  OR
  B. Manager of professionals in a standard work area receiving executive direction.
  OR
  C. Second-line manager of professionals in a standard work area.
  OR
  D. Manager of one professional or two or more non-professionals in a complex area receiving executive direction.
15
A. Manager of professionals in a complex work area receiving executive direction.
  OR
  B. Second-line manager of professionals in a complex work area.
  OR
  C. Second-line manager of professionals in a standard work area receiving executive direction.
  OR
  D. Third-line manager of professionals in a standard work area.
16
A. Second-line manager of professionals in a complex work area receiving executive direction.
  OR
  B. Third-line manager of professionals in a complex work.
  OR
  C. Third-line manager of professionals in a standard work area receiving executive direction.
  OR
  D. Fourth-line manager of professionals in a standard work area.
Michigan Business One Stop
Link to Department and Agencies Web Site Index
Link to Statewide Online Services Index
Link to Statewide Web-based Surveys
Link to RSS feeds available on this site
Related Content
 •  Professional Specialist Position Evaluation System PDF icon
 •  Your Guide to On-Site Position Reviews

Michigan.gov Home | MCSC Home | Contact MCSC | State Web Sites
Privacy Policy | Link Policy | Accessibility Policy | Security Policy | Michigan News | Michigan.gov Survey

Copyright © 2001-2009 State of Michigan