| Position:
Support.
Problem/Background:Michigan ranks
12th in the nation in the size of our foreign-born population
(just above 500,000). Immigrants
entering this country face increased scrutiny due to the heightened
awareness and federal interventions imposed by federal agencies in response
to the tragedies of September
11, 2001.
As a result, new security measures and new Immigration Services procedures
make it necessary for the individual to be able to rely on competent
assistance in navigating such systems.
This
bill intends to provide protection for residents in this state who seek
information/assistance about naturalization and immigration matters
from people hired to act in their behalf.
Description
of Bill: The
bill would prohibit an individual from providing “services”
or act as an “immigration clerical assistant” (ICA)
unless the individual is placed on a list maintained by the Michigan
Department of Labor and Economic Growth.
“Services” means any action taken on behalf of any consumer
for the benefit of that consumer or another individual regarding the
immigrant status, nonimmigrant status, or citizenship
status of any consumer or other individual.
The types of immigration-related activities include transcribing responses
onto government forms; translating to a non-English language; drafting
applications and other paperwork for a consumer; giving advice to a
consumer, etc.
Violations
of the act are misdemeanors, punishable for up to 93 days and/or a fine
of not more than $1,000.00
A second or subsequent offense would be punishable for up to two years
and/or a fine of not more than $10,000.00
A person injured by an ICA may bring a court action for equitable relief
or damages, or both. The
court shall also grant reasonable attorney fees and may order the
ICA
removed
from the list for at least 5 years, or as otherwise ordered.
Summary
of Arguments
Pro:One
of the roles of government is to “help people help themselves.”
This bill would allow the public to access a departmental listing to
make sure the person they have hired to act on their behalf in immigration
and other matters is in good standing and on a list of names authorized
to perform such duties by the department.
It is hoped that this bill would reduce the number of predators who
promise results that can’t be delivered or those who pass themselves
off as attorneys, and whose actions have been directly responsible for
the deportation of many individuals who would otherwise be eligible
for legal status.
Michigan
Farm
Bureau
Con:Creating
a law to require individuals to be added to a list may not necessarily
result in the elimination of “underground” immigration assistance
services. The fear of many
immigrants to interface with governmental authorities may continue to
drive them underground to seek unauthorized services.
As the purchasers of illicit services, many immigrants may be reluctant
to report incidents involving underground service providers for fear
of further governmental reprisal.
The
department is not aware of any opponents of this legislation.
Fiscal/Economic
Impact
(a)
Department
Budgetary:
The
department estimates that the revenues charged for maintaining the list
should be self-supportive, provided the bill directs the monies back
toward the program.
Revenue:
Although
no solid figures can be provided, it is estimated that there may be
as many as 500 individuals providing ICA
services
in Michigan.
Therefore, as a rough estimate, 500 original applications would generate
$125,000 (500 ICAs x $250), and renewal fees would generate $45,000
every three years, or $15,000 per year (500 ICAs x $90).
Comments:
There
is no way to accurately predict the number of ICAs that will seek to
be added to the list, as those services are not currently quantified
statistically. The department
relied on the estimate provided by the legislative work group, which
approximated 500 ICAs.
(b)
State
Budgetary:
Section
9(3) states that the $250 will be used to “cover the costs of
developing, maintaining, and administering the list;” therefore,
the monies for the program are self-supporting.
This bill should be neutral to the budget.
Revenue:
Section
9(3) states that the $250 will be used to “cover the costs of
developing, maintaining, and administering the list;” therefore,
the monies for the program are self-supporting.
This bill should be neutral to the budget.
Comments:
The
department currently maintains a list of interior design professionals.
The costs of administering that program serve as a basis for determining
the costs of administering the ICA
program.
Beyond the basic costs of developing and maintaining the list, this
bill also adds the requirement for the department to serve “notice
of non-compliance” if certain information is lacking, incomplete,
or changes. The added costs
of correspondence and processing were therefore added when calculating
the cost/revenue basis.
(c)
Local Government:
Comments:
This
bill does not involve the department in enforcement activity.
Instead, the local prosecutor would have that responsibility.
Other
State Departments: This
bill does not affect other state departments.
Any
Other Pertinent Information: The
department was an active participant in the workgroup that helped modify
the language of the bill after introduction.
Administrative
Rules Impact: There
are no administrative rules required by this act. |