![]() ![]() |
|
|
close print view
House Bill 5763 (Enrolled)Analysis |
|
|
Topic: |
Bankruptcy |
Sponsor: |
Representative
Lipsey |
Co-Sponsors: |
Representatives
Bieda, Anderson, Kolb, Tobocman, Gleason, Adamini, Gilllard, Whitmer, Gaffney,
Howell and LaSata |
Committees: |
House Judiciary |
Senate Judiciary Date
Introduced: |
April 1,
2004 |
Date
Enrolled: |
December
9, 2004 |
Date
of Analysis: |
October 8,
2004 |
Position: |
The Department
of Labor & Economic Growth is neutral on the bill. |
|
Background: The monetary threshold for most property types exempt from claims of creditors in bankruptcy proceedings has not been updated since the early 1960’s. The purpose of the exemptions is to provide a debtor enough assets and means to rebuild his or her life. A legislative task force found in 2003 that the current exemption thresholds were inadequate. Description of Bill: The bill adds two sections to the Revised Judicature Act of 1961. Section 5451 exempts certain property from bankruptcy proceedings, including family pictures, individual retirement accounts, and right or interest in certain pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, or other qualified plans. Thresholds for crops, farm animals and feed for farm animals; household goods; pets, motor vehicles; computers; tools, implements, materials or other things needed to carry on a profession or occupation; and credit union accounts were updated. Michigan citizens could continue to choose to use the federal exemptions in lieu of the state exemptions. The bill requires the State Treasurer to adjust the dollar amount thresholds every three years to reflect the cumulative change in the Consumer Price Index. A new Section 6023a exempts certain property held jointly by a husband and wife as a tenancy from a judgment entered against only one spouse. Summary of Arguments Pro: The exemptions in Michigan law related to bankruptcies have not been updated in many years. As a result, debtors often have insufficient assets and resources to rebuild their lives and may require public assistance. The bill would allow the bankruptcy laws to work as intended. Con: Although adjustments to Michigan’s bankruptcy exemptions are needed, the bill appears to create confusion by not amending or repealing Section 6023 of the act. This section contains the current exemptions. The original House-introduced bill did amend Section 6023. Fiscal/Economic Impact
Budgetary: There is no direct budgetary impact on the department. Revenue: The bill will have no impact on department revenues. Comments:
Budgetary: There is no direct budgetary impact on the state. Revenue: The bill will have no impact on state revenues. Comments:
Comments: Other
State Departments: Any
Other Pertinent Information: Administrative
Rules Impact:
|
| ||||||||||||
|
Michigan.gov Home | LARA Home | State Web Sites | Office of Regulatory Reinvention | Spending & Accountability Accessibility Policy | Link Policy | Privacy Policy | Security Policy | Michigan News | Michigan.gov Survey Copyright © 2001-2013 State of Michigan |