Browsers that can not handle javascript will not be able to access some features of this site.
Skip Navigation
Department of Energy, Labor & Economic GrowthMichigan.gov, Official Web Site for the State of Michigan
Michigan.gov Home DELEG Home | Sitemap | Contacts | Online Services | Agencies
Printer Friendly Version Printer Friendly   Text Only Version Text Version  Share this page.
Coordinated Equity Review Program FAQ's

What is the purpose of coordinated review of equity offerings?
Can any issuer offering equity securities participate in coordinated equity review?
How does an issuer apply for coordinated equity review?
Can an issuer participate in coordinated equity review with respect to some states but not all states in which it is seeking registration?
Can an issuer participate in the program with respect to disclosure review but not merit review?
Can an issuer use the coordinated review program for offerings that already have been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission?
Can an issuer add jurisdictions to the coordinated review of an offering after the review process has begun?
Who will send comments to the issuer?
What is the purpose of having two lead states?
Since two lead states will be selected, will the issuer receive separate comment letters from them?
How will lead states be selected?
How soon after an application is filed will the lead states be selected?
What is the function of the lead states?
If the issuer selects only one merit or one disclosure state on the CER-1, will that state automatically be the lead state?
What is the time line for issuing the initial comment letter?
How do the issuer and the participating states know the identity of the lead states and when comments are due?
What are specific comments?
What standards of review are utilized in coordinated equity review?
Can the coordinated review standards (i.e., NASAA statements of policy) be waived?
What is the issuers recourse in the event the participating states do not agree to a waiver of the coordinated review standards?
How will the lead states resolve outstanding comments?
After the initial registration application is filed, are there any materials that the issuer is responsible for forwarding directly to the participating jurisdictions?
How will the participating jurisdictions know that each lead state has cleared the application?
Can the lead disclosure state clear an application before it is cleared by the lead merit state?
Once the lead disclosure state clears the application, is it cleared in all participating disclosure jurisdictions?
Once the lead merit state clears the application, is it cleared in all participating merit jurisdictions?
 
 
Question What is the purpose of coordinated review of equity offerings?
Answer

The purpose is to streamline the registration process for issuers and to promote uniformity among the states that participate by applying set standards to equity offerings.

   
Question Can any issuer offering equity securities participate in coordinated equity review?
Answer

No. Coordinated equity review generally is intended only for initial public offerings of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, rights and units comprised of equity securities that also are seeking registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. Coordinated equity review is not available for Regulation A offerings. Blank check and blind pool offerings do not qualify for coordinated equity review. Coordinated equity review may not be available for an offering, even if the offering fits within the initial screening criteria.

   
Question How does an issuer apply for coordinated equity review?
Answer

An issuer must file an Application for Coordinated State Review (CER-1) in all states in which it is seeking to register its securities in addition to filing forms, fees and other documents required by each state. The issuer should file these documents contemporaneously in each state in which it is seeking to register the securities. The issuer also should file a CER-1, without fees, together with a cover letter indicating its intent to seek coordinated equity review in Pennsylvania, the Program Administrator state. If the issuer has filed an application to register the securities in Pennsylvania and has requested coordinated equity review, it is not necessary to file an additional CER-1.

   
Question Can an issuer participate in coordinated equity review with respect to some states but not all states in which it is seeking registration?
Answer

Yes. Those states in which the issuer files separately will apply separate state standards of review.

   
Question Can an issuer participate in the program with respect to disclosure review but not merit review?
Answer

Yes.

   
Question Can an issuer use the coordinated review program for offerings that already have been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission?
Answer

Yes.

   
Question Can an issuer add jurisdictions to the coordinated review of an offering after the review process has begun?
Answer

An issuer may add as many jurisdictions as it desires so long as such additions occur within the initial 10-day comment period, by amending the CER-1 and filing it with each participating state and Pennsylvania. The comment period will be extended an additional five (5) business days from the date each amendment is received. If an issuer seeks to add a jurisdiction after the initial 10-day comment period, acceptance of that addition is discretionary.

   
Question Who will send comments to the issuer?
Answer

A lead disclosure state and a lead merit state will be selected from the states the issuer has indicated on the CER-1 as the states in which it is requesting coordinated review. The lead states are responsible for sending comment letters.

   
Question What is the purpose of having two lead states?
Answer

States have been separated into merit and disclosure states. The lead disclosure state is chosen from those states that apply a disclosure standard of review. The lead merit state is chosen from those states that apply a merit standard of review. The lead merit state will have primary responsibility for negotiating resolution to merit issues and the lead disclosure state will have primary responsibility for negotiating resolution to disclosure issues, although in certain cases there will be overlap between the issues.

   
Question Since two lead states will be selected, will the issuer receive separate comment letters from them?
Answer

The lead states will work together to produce a single comment letter that includes disclosure, merit and state specific comments. The issuer will address the merit and disclosure comments in a single response letter. The issuer will provide a response to state specific comments directly to the states making the comments.

   
Question How will lead states be selected?
Answer

The lead states will be selected from those states that have volunteered to act as a lead state. Pennsylvania will be responsible for selecting the lead states. The issuer does not have the option of selecting specific lead jurisdictions. Pennsylvania will select the lead states on the basis of a number of factors including the states' resources and experience in reviewing coordinated equity review applications. There may be no correlation between the lead states and the issuer's home state.

   
Question How soon after an application is filed will the lead states be selected?
Answer

The lead states will be selected within three (3) business days after Pennsylvania has received the application.

   
Question What is the function of the lead states?
Answer

The lead states will act as a team to prepare the initial comment letter in consultation with the other participating jurisdictions. The lead states are responsible for negotiating a resolution of comments with the issuer.

   
Question If the issuer selects only one merit or one disclosure state on the CER-1, will that state automatically be the lead state?
Answer

If the issuer selects only one merit state, that state will be the lead merit state. In this situation, the lead merit state will make comments consistent with the coordinated equity review standards, unless the state's own standards are less restrictive and the state elects to apply them. If the issuer selects only one disclosure state, that state will be the lead disclosure state, unless that state elects to have the lead merit state serve as both lead merit and disclosure state and the lead merit state accepts that responsibility.

   
Question What is the time line for issuing the initial comment letter?
Answer

The participating jurisdictions have ten (10) business days to submit their comments to the lead jurisdictions. Within another five (5) business days, the lead states collect and consolidate all comments and create a single letter to be sent to the issuer. The five (5) business day period includes a two (2) business day period for the participating jurisdictions to review the comment letter for changes and corrections.

   
Question How do the issuer and the participating states know the identity of the lead states and when comments are due?
Answer

As indicated above Pennsylvania has three days to select the lead states. The three (3) day period will begin to run the day after Pennsylvania receives notice on a CER-1 that the issuer is seeking to register its securities under coordinated equity review. Pennsylvania will notify the issuer and the participating jurisdictions to the identity of the lead states and the following dates: (1) date by which participating jurisdictions must submit comments to the lead states, (2) date by which the lead states must submit a draft letter to the commenting jurisdictions, (3) date by which participating jurisdictions must submit changes or corrections to the lead states, and (4) date on which the comment letter is due to the issuer.

   
Question What are state specific comments?
Answer

State specific comments are comments relating to forms, incorrect fee calculations, broker-dealer registration and the need for additional documents. To the extent these comments do not conflict with the coordinated equity review standards, they will be included in the comment letter sent by the lead states.

   
Question What standards of review are utilized in coordinated equity review?
Answer The NASAA statements of policy relating to offerings of equity securities provide the substantive standards for review of offerings where the issuer has elected to participate in coordinated review. A particular NASAA statement of policy may set forth limitations or thresholds that an offering must meet or it may require that specific disclosures appear in the prospectus. In making the decision as to whether to utilize coordinated equity review, the issuer should consider whether the offering complies with the NASAA statements of policy.
   
Question Can the coordinated review standards (i.e., NASAA statements of policy) be waived?
Answer The NASAA statements of policy can be waived only if all (100%) of the participating merit states (and/or disclosure states if the waiver request applies to a disclosure issue) agree to the waiver.
   
Question What is the issuer's recourse in the event the participating states do not agree to a waiver of the coordinated review standards?
Answer The issuer may withdraw from the coordinated equity review process in those states that do not agree to the waiver. If the issuer wishes to continue the registration process in those states, states will apply their guidelines for non-coordinated equity review offerings.
   
Question How will the lead states resolve outstanding comments?
Answer The lead states will communicate with the issuer and the participating jurisdictions to resolve outstanding comments. The lead states are encouraged to consult with the state issuing a particular comment to confirm that an issuer's response satisfies the state's concern.
   
Question After the initial registration application is filed, are there any materials that the issuer is responsible for forwarding directly to the participating jurisdictions?
Answer Yes. The issuer must forward any amendments to the registration statement, uniform forms and CER-1 directly to the participating states. Additionally, the issuer must resolve state specific comments directly with the state issuing the comment. Further, the issuer must send notices relating to the status of the offering (e.g., notice of SEC effectiveness, withdrawal notices) directly to the participating jurisdictions. The lead states are responsible for forwarding the issuer's response letters to the participating jurisdictions.
   
Question How will the participating jurisdictions know that each lead state has cleared the application?
Answer Participating jurisdictions will receive same-day notice from each lead state when the application has been cleared by that state.
   
Question Can the lead disclosure state clear an application before it is cleared by the lead merit state?
Answer Yes.
   
Question Once the lead disclosure state clears the application, is it cleared in all participating disclosure jurisdictions?
Answer Yes.
   
Question Once the lead merit state clears the application, is it cleared in all participating merit jurisdictions?
Answer

Yes.

   
Michigan Business One Stop
Link to Department and Agencies Web Site Index
Link to Statewide Online Services Index
Link to Statewide Web-based Surveys
Link to RSS feeds available on this site
Related Content
 •  Investment Adviser Representative Registration FAQ's
 •  Mortgage Loan Officer Amendment, Change in Employer/Sponsor, Termination of Employment FAQs
 •  COBRA FAQ's
 •  Mortgage Loan Officer Fees, Application, and Renewal FAQs
 •  Mortgage Loan Officer Examination, Investigation, Penalties, and Retainment of Records FAQs
 •  Mortgage Loan Officer General FAQs
 •  Mortgage Loan Officer Education, Examination, and Criminal History Check FAQs
 •  AIG Consumer FAQ's
 •  Mortgage Broker, Lender, and Servicer FAQs
 •  The Mortgage Industry Advisory Board FAQs
 •  Insurance Licensee Continuing Education FAQs
 •  Investment Adviser Online Form FAQs
 •  Insurance Continuing Ed Waiver FAQs
 •  Money Transmission Services Act FAQ's
 •  Insurance Coverage and Rating FAQ's
 •  Insurance Bail Bond Writer and Bounty Hunter FAQs
 •  Insurance Compensation and Rebating FAQs
 •  Consumer Mortgage Protection Act FAQs
 •  Public Employers Health Benefit Act (PA 106) FAQ's
 •  Small Employer Group Health Coverage Act

Michigan.gov Home | DELEG Home | State Web Sites
Accessibility Policy | Link Policy | Privacy Policy | Security Policy | Michigan News | Michigan.gov Survey

Copyright © 2001-2009 State of Michigan